Harrell/Harris of Shelby Co., KY and Ripley Co., IN

Welcome to the Harrell Collaborative Forums General Discussion Harrell/Harris of Shelby Co., KY and Ripley Co., IN

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • barryrsmith posted #1798

      (Sorry if this is already well-covered under the 14 families, but I didn’t see it in my initial search)

      I descend from Martha Harrell who married Joshua Harris. He was born in the 1750s, served in the Virginia Line, then reportedly married Martha in 1788 in Washington County, Tennessee. His marriage and family are described in a deposition from his Rev. War pension application. He was in Shelby County, Kentucky, appearing in a tax list there in 1801 and subsequent years. He consistently appeared there in tax lists neighboring James Herrald, both shown as having land on Six Mile Creek. In the 1810 census are found consecutive households with heads John Herrald, Joshua Harris, and James Herrald. Joshua and Martha’s daughters Sarah and Cassaner/Suzannah Harris married Absalom Harrell and James Harrell. I would guess these were two of the sons in either John or James Harrell’s households.

      Many online trees state that James was a son of “John David Harrell.” I have not seen primary evidence of a man of this name in that place at that time, when it was unusual to have a middle name, and I see lots of trees with two other “John David Harrells” born around the same time and going very different ways. It smells to me like the stench of a bunch of garbage conflations.

      On the other hand, I have autosomal DNA matches to several purported descendants of John David Harrell, so it seems to me that Martha and or James/John living next door to her were likely siblings. The lack of a John in the tax lists in Shelby County, and his being reportedly under 45 in the 1810 census, suggests to me that he was not the patriarch of this family group. In any case, it disagrees with him being the John David Harrell supposedly born around 1763, and I see no evidence of the name “David” being assigned to that John.

      I am wondering if this family has been studied by this group (I have no idea if they came from Virginia, other than their connection with the Harris family that was known to have come from Virginia.) Thanks for your help/time.

      Barry

    • Cathie Harrell Fox posted #1800

      This is interesting. My group migrated settle just north of Ripley County, Indiana in Decatur County, Indiana. Philip Harrell b 1787 who I am seeking evidence of parentage and his brothers. At the moment I have several possibilities but unable to put the pieces together. Absolom Harrell was on my radar but have failed to make any connection. In my past research I have no evidence Absolom was related to Phillip Harrell only by location. In a family history book of the Harrell’s it was stated that Absolom Harrell was b. 10 Nov. 1800 and d. 23 Sept 1877. Buried in North Marion Baptist , Ripley Co, In. It also listed the children.

    • Bill Thielbahr posted #1801

      I am Bill Thielbahr, one of the contributors to the Harrell Collaborative (the 14 Families). I have spent a lot of time studying John David Harrell 1763 and his children because they lived in many of the same areas as the Harrells who are part of the 14 Families. I tried several times to find a male descendent of John David’s family to take the Y-DNA test and I failed. I have evidence that this John David Harrell 1763 is not genetically connected to the 14 Harrell families listed in the Harrell Collaborative – I don’t have a Y-DNA profile of John David but I know of a (female) descendent of him whom I know is related to another Harrell who has a Y-DNA profile; this profile shows John David Harrell as not being genetically connected to the 14 Harrell families studied in the Harrell Collaborative. I would like to discuss this further with you but don’t want to engage in a lengthy discussion on the Harrell Collaborative. Please email me at tbar@srv.net . Bill Thielbahr

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.